Highlighted processes

A progressive engagement strategy was launched for partners to familiarize themselves and get involved with participating on our online platform.

Participation can be confusing and comlicated, but not here. Here we can help find answers, discuss, and imagine new solutions!

Below are spaces to initiate debates, propose ideas, keep up with what's going on or report bugs:

🤔  Do you have a great proposal for a new feature?

🐛 Did you find a bug in the software?

💬 Do you want to debate something with other members of the community?

🔧 Do you want to follow the life cycle of the accepted features?

The Open Heritage glossary of keywords on heritage reuse clarifies the meaning and use of several terms that are relevant to the OpenHeritage project.

Before the consortium meeting in Barcelona, OH partners were asked in November 2018 to send in ‘hypotheses’ to prepare and explore the ideas around Open Heritage. These ‘hypotheses’ recorded as proposals within this process were used to support ongoing academic research as well as clarify what underlying assumptions and knowledge partners bring to heritage work. However, much of this took place before the Open Heritage Decidim platform was up and running. So hypotheses were sent through email and voted on through a physical in person process using ‘dotmocracy’ where participants (partners) voiced their votes through puttin...

Berlin meeting proposals