Normative Criteria for Relevant Evaluation
recording best practices
Normative criteria make transparent the value orientation that guides the evaluation in OpenHeritage.
Normative criteria help people identify “good practice” or “good policy”. These criteria thus point to goals or objectives. They should be broad enough to be applicable regardless of circumstances. They are not intended to allow for comparison (good, better, best), but serve more as a value orientation that guides OpenHeritage project.
Good practice criteria- Important criteria See all proposals (6)
The implementation of usage concepts with reliable and resilient economic structures is a key...
Involving the exchange with other not-for-profit and non-governmental organizations is the...
Adaptive reuse practices can be places of cooperation that connect their new uses with the needs...
Amendment
Evaluating
Involving the exchange with other not-for-profit and non-governmental organizationsis the...
Good policy criteria See all proposals (10)
D.12 (Veldpaus et al., 2019) and D1.3 (Mérai et al, 2020) show reuse is best facilitated in...
Adaptive heritage re-use policies that try to link the re-use of material and immaterial aspects...
Amendment
Evaluating
Integrated policy processes allow taking into account various fields and expertise, setting up...
This criteria has been removed from good policy criteria.
Good practice criteria- Necessary criteria See all proposals (12)
Fostering ecological sustainability in adaptive heritage reuse – extending the life cycle of...
In the process of implementation, the financing is secured through various channels to evade...
Amendment
Evaluating
Co-governance is a multi-stakeholder governance arrangement whereby the community emerges as a...
Social sustainability recognizes the significance and diversity of community, the critical...
Start date
February 17, 2020
End date
January 31, 2021
Reference: OH-PART-2020-02-66
Statistics
2
Participants
17
Followers
196
Comments
28
Share: