Normative Criteria for Relevant Evaluation
recording best practices
Normative criteria make transparent the value orientation that guides the evaluation in OpenHeritage.
Normative criteria help people identify “good practice” or “good policy”. These criteria thus point to goals or objectives. They should be broad enough to be applicable regardless of circumstances. They are not intended to allow for comparison (good, better, best), but serve more as a value orientation that guides OpenHeritage project.
Good policy criteria See all proposals (10)
Urban experimentalism entails a methodological approach for institutionally designed processes...
Adaptive heritage reuse relies on unique solutions depending on the specific heritage site and...
Amendment
Evaluating
Integrated policy processes allow taking into account various fields and expertise, setting up...
Policy when open to and supportive of civic engagement, and beyond that civic initiative is...
Good practice criteria- Important criteria See all proposals (6)
The implementation of usage concepts with reliable and resilient economic structures is a key...
Amendment
Evaluating
Involving the exchange with other not-for-profit and non-governmental organizationsis the...
Adaptive reuse practices can be places of cooperation that connect their new uses with the needs...
Involving the exchange with other not-for-profit and non-governmental organizations is the...
Good practice criteria- Necessary criteria See all proposals (12)
Co-governance is a multi-stakeholder governance arrangement whereby the community emerges as a...
Developing and maintaining local partnerships (both in informal or formal / legal structures) is...
In the process of implementation, the financing is secured through various channels to evade...
Amendment
Evaluating
1) PROTECTING MULTIPLE HERITAGE VALUES RELATED TO AN OBJECT
Adaptive reuse practices expand...
Start date
February 17, 2020
End date
January 31, 2021
Reference: OH-PART-2020-02-66
Statistics
2
Participants
16
Followers
28
Share: