Normative Criteria for Relevant Evaluation
recording best practices
Normative criteria make transparent the value orientation that guides the evaluation in OpenHeritage.
Normative criteria help people identify “good practice” or “good policy”. These criteria thus point to goals or objectives. They should be broad enough to be applicable regardless of circumstances. They are not intended to allow for comparison (good, better, best), but serve more as a value orientation that guides OpenHeritage project.
Good policy criteria See all proposals (10)
Integrative policies allow taking into account various fields and expertise, setting up...
D.12 (Veldpaus et al., 2019) and D1.3 (Mérai et al, 2020) show reuse is best facilitated in...
Amendment
Evaluating
Integrated policy processes allow taking into account various fields and expertise, setting up...
Urban experimentalism entails a methodological approach for institutionally designed processes...
Good practice criteria- Important criteria See all proposals (6)
The implementation of usage concepts with reliable and resilient economic structures is a key...
Involving the exchange with other not-for-profit and non-governmental organizations is the...
For adaptive reuse projects to be self-sustainable, the (new / future) users–often creative,...
Amendment
Evaluating
Involving the exchange with other not-for-profit and non-governmental organizations
is the...
Good practice criteria- Necessary criteria See all proposals (12)
Social sustainability recognizes the significance and diversity of community, the critical...
In the process of implementation, the financing is secured through various channels to evade...
Fostering ecological sustainability in adaptive heritage reuse – extending the life cycle of...
Developing and maintaining local partnerships (both in informal or formal / legal structures) is...
Start date
February 17, 2020
End date
January 31, 2021
Reference: OH-PART-2020-02-66
Statistics
2
Participants
16
Followers
28
Share: