This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about cookies.
OpenHeritage Participatory Platform's official logo

Normative Criteria for Relevant Evaluation

recording best practices

Phase 1 of 1
Introduction ? - ?
Process phases

Changes at "fostering social sustainability"

Compare view mode:
HTML view mode:

Title

  • +3
  • +3
Deletions
Additions
Deletions
Additions
  • +3

Body

  • +Hence, the protection of these values implies a shift from the heritage as thing approach to heritage as an ongoing process (Knippenberg 2019).Although the variety of aspects to be considered might create conflicts along the adaptation process (e.g. community needs vs compatible use, continuous access vs physical preservation, etc.) the equal care of -often- opposite elements foster the understanding and integration of existing heritage status, values and conditions into the protecting process, providing the reasons for all proposed interventions (ICOMS 2019). By protecting multiple heritage values as something in flux and adaptable to an ever changing present (Harrison 2013, Högberg 2016), it is acknowledges the need for an ongoing maintenance, participated by local communities and supported by dynamic approaches to respectful and compatible adaptive reuse and management (ICOMS 2019).
  • +Hence, the protection of these values implies a shift from the heritage as thing approach to heritage as an ongoing process (Knippenberg 2019).Although the variety of aspects to be considered might create conflicts along the adaptation process (e.g. community needs vs compatible use, continuous access vs physical preservation, etc.) the equal care of -often- opposite elements foster the understanding and integration of existing heritage status, values and conditions into the protecting process, providing the reasons for all proposed interventions (ICOMS 2019). By protecting multiple heritage values as something in flux and adaptable to an ever changing present (Harrison 2013, Högberg 2016), it is acknowledges the need for an ongoing maintenance, participated by local communities and supported by dynamic approaches to respectful and compatible adaptive reuse and management (ICOMS 2019).
Deletions
Additions
Deletions
Additions
  • +Hence, the protection of these values implies a shift from the heritage as thing approach to heritage as an ongoing process (Knippenberg 2019).Although the variety of aspects to be considered might create conflicts along the adaptation process (e.g. community needs vs compatible use, continuous access vs physical preservation, etc.) the equal care of -often- opposite elements foster the understanding and integration of existing heritage status, values and conditions into the protecting process, providing the reasons for all proposed interventions (ICOMS 2019). By protecting multiple heritage values as something in flux and adaptable to an ever changing present (Harrison 2013, Högberg 2016), it is acknowledges the need for an ongoing maintenance, participated by local communities and supported by dynamic approaches to respectful and compatible adaptive reuse and management (ICOMS 2019).
Version number 1 out of 7 Show all versions Go back to proposal
Version author
author-avatar 蔡珊笛
Version created at 18/02/2020 15:56
Europe flag
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 776766.
The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the European Union.
Neither the EASME nor the European Commission is responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Creative Commons License Website made with free software by Platoniq.

Please sign in

Forgot your password?

Or